Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable skill with clear sequencing, a working referenced script, and efficient token use. It scores well across all dimensions, with only minor room to separate inlined per-type detail into reference files and to add an explicit validation checkpoint when type detection fails.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation checkpoint in Step 1/Step 2: 'If --type auto returns unknown, inspect the raw output head and re-run with an explicit --type flag rather than proceeding.'
Consider moving the per-type interpretation bullets (Step 3) into a reference file (e.g. references/interpretation.md) to tighten the overview further.
Show a short example of expected explain.py output for one type so the interpretation step is fully concrete.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and mostly assumes Claude's competence, using tables and short Action/Expectation/Result blocks rather than explaining what Z3 or models are; the only mild padding is the repeated per-type bullet lists in Step 3 that partially restate the table. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable invocations ('python3 scripts/explain.py --file output.txt', '--stdin', '--debug') plus a parameters table, and the referenced explain.py exists and matches; minor gaps include no example of interpreting actual sample output or showing expected command output. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly sequenced (identify type → run explainer → interpret) with explicit fallback guidance ('If detection fails, re-run with an explicit --type flag') and an auto-detection escape hatch; this is read-only interpretation so destructive/batch caps do not apply, though explicit validation checkpoints for failed detection are slightly implicit. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear sections with a real single bundle script (scripts/explain.py) referenced and present; the overview stays concise and points to the script for detail, though no separate reference files exist and some detail (per-type interpretation) is inlined that could live in references. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |