Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is well-structured, executable, and concise, with real bundle references and a clear workflow including feedback loops. It lacks an explicit validation step, though the operation is non-destructive so that is a minor gap rather than a cap.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with terse Action/Expectation/Result blocks and no padding about what Z3 is, though the opening motivation sentence and a restated default-chain note are minor tokens that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Three copy-paste-ready invocations (inline formula, file input, debug) plus a complete parameters table and a tactic reference table give fully executable guidance covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear three-step sequence (choose tactics, run, interpret) with feedback loops ('If unchanged, try a different tactic chain'), but no explicit validation checkpoint; this is non-destructive single-formula work so the batch/destructive cap does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections with the one bundle reference (scripts/simplify.py) being a real, one-level-deep file; parameters and tactic tables are appropriately inline, with only minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |