Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured, actionable, and has a clear workflow with validation checkpoints; its only weakness is mild redundancy from the Action/Expectation/Result framework restating output states.
Suggestions
Eliminate the repeated enumeration of sat/unsat/unknown/timeout across Step 2 Result and Step 3 Expectation — state it once and reference it, or trim the Expectation lines that restate the Result.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and does not explain concepts Claude already knows, but the Action/Expectation/Result structure repeats the sat/unsat/unknown/timeout output states across Step 2 Result and Step 3 Expectation, so it could be tightened — matching the score-2 anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable commands ('python3 scripts/solve.py --formula ...', '--file', '--debug') plus a complete Parameters table referencing the real scripts/solve.py bundle file — copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The three-step sequence has explicit checkpoints: Step 1 gates on valid SMT-LIB2 (run encode first if needed) and Step 3 gives per-outcome recovery (try simplify / increase timeout), matching the score-3 anchor of clear sequence with validation and feedback loops. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single-purpose skill under 50 lines, well-organized into steps and a parameters table; the referenced scripts/solve.py is a real one-level-deep bundle file with no nested reference chains, so the simple-skill allowance yields a 3. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |