Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is efficient and well-structured with concrete commands and clear sequencing, requiring only a more complete Task tool invocation example and edge-case handling to reach top marks.
Suggestions
Include a concrete copy-paste Task tool invocation block showing subagent_type and prompt construction for the common case.
Add an explicit branch for when the agent makes no changes or errors out, so the post-completion workflow has a clear fallback.
Specify how to pass $ARGUMENTS guidance into the agent prompt concretely rather than only by reference.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence, with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, mostly executable guidance including the exact subagent_type and specific git commands, but stops short of a full copy-paste Task tool invocation example. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly sequenced for both scope determination and post-completion review, with a soft commit confirmation checkpoint, though explicit handling of edge cases (no changes vs. agent errors) is missing. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A short, single-purpose skill under 50 lines with no need for external references; it is well-organized with clear section headers, satisfying the simple-skill exception. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |