Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, actionable instruction set for delegating to a simplifier agent, with exact commands and a clear post-run checklist. Its only weaknesses are minor: a redundant opening line and the absence of a sample agent prompt or a rollback step if the changes are unsatisfactory.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — no concept explanations, no padding — but the opening sentence ("...for clarity, consistency, and maintainability") duplicates the description and could be trimmed. That minor over-explanation fits the anchor 4 example rather than the every-token-earns-its-place anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and executable: exact subagent_type, exact commands ("git diff --name-only main...HEAD" or "git status"), a $ARGUMENTS placeholder, and invocation examples. It falls short of fully copy-paste ready because no example prompt for the agent itself is provided, keeping it at anchor 4 rather than 5; it is well above the pseudocode-level anchor 3. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence is clearly laid out — scope determination, running the agent, then a numbered post-agent checklist that includes "Review the changes made" as a checkpoint. It lacks an explicit feedback loop for the case where the changes are wrong (no revert/retry step), so it matches anchor 4 rather than the explicit-validation anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a simple, single-purpose skill under 50 lines with no external references needed; per the scoring notes, well-organized sections ("## Your Task", "## Examples") suffice. The body is appropriately split into task, scope rules, post-steps, and examples with no inlined content that belongs elsewhere. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |