Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured and highly actionable with explicit gates and a reference section, but it carries meaningful repetition of the compliance caveat and scope boundaries that a tighter pass would consolidate.
Suggestions
State the 'guidance, not legal advice; confirm with counsel' caveat once (e.g. in Instructions) and reference it rather than repeating it across the intro, Scope guard, and Decision Gates.
Consolidate the sibling-skill boundaries into a single Scope guard or Reference Materials entry; the consent-registry/auditor handoff is currently restated in five places.
Add one short rendered example of the expected output (a sample sequence-map row set or reply-triage branch table) to lift actionability from concrete-directive to copy-paste-ready.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is information-dense and avoids explaining basics Claude already knows, but it repeats the same scope boundaries several times — 'guidance, not legal advice' appears ~4 times and the consent-registry/auditor handoff and 'Not for ...' sibling boundaries are restated across Skill Contract, Scope guard, Instructions, Reference Materials, and Next Best Skill, so it could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Each of the seven numbered steps gives concrete directives — e.g. 'build a branch table that routes every reply type ... positive (hand to sales / book), objection (rebuttal branch), referral (re-route to named contact, log the referral), not-now (defer + re-enroll date), and opt-out (suppress immediately)' — with specific profile numbers and a Pass/Partial/Fail/Unknown/N/A rubric; the main gap is the absence of a rendered example artifact. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear seven-step sequence is backed by explicit validation checkpoints (NEEDS_INPUT gating on missing consent basis or partial S coverage), a Done-when checklist, and Stop/Continue decision gates; it falls short of 5 only because the error-recovery feedback loop is handed off to the auditor rather than contained as a numbered step here. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The SKILL.md is a lean overview with a dedicated, labeled 'Reference Materials' section pointing one level deep to send-benchmark.md, skill-contract.md, CONNECTORS.md, SECURITY.md, and sibling skills, each with a one-line description — content is appropriately externalized and navigation is easy. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |