CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

early-access-designer

Use when the user asks to "design an early access program", "set up a waitlist and beta stages", or "define beta graduation criteria"; produces a waitlist→concept→alpha→beta→GA stage ladder with per-stage purpose and opt-in semantics, quantified graduation criteria per stage (labeled Estimated), a cohort-gating and invite-throttling plan, tester recruitment with launch-day social-proof prep, a feedback-loop spec where every status change notifies its subscribers, and a referral-loop mechanism spec (invite codes, anti-abuse). Not for waitlist acquisition strategy or the capture-flow spec — use list-growth-designer; not for the canonical stage record — use launch-registry. waitlist/内测阶梯/抢先体验/毕业标准/反馈闭环

73

Quality

92%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

85%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is highly actionable with a clear, checkpointed workflow and clean one-level reference structure. Its only weakness is conciseness — the scope-guard/handoff material is restated in several sections and could be consolidated.

Suggestions

Consolidate the repeated handoff/scope-guard material: the intro, Scope guard block, Skill Contract, and Reference Materials each re-list the same adjacent skills (launch-registry, list-growth-designer, newsletter-monetization-planner); state each boundary once and reference it.

The Reference Materials list and Next Best Skill section overlap almost entirely (launch-registry, list-growth-designer, launch-feedback-synthesizer all appear twice) — merge or cross-reference to cut the duplication.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but the same handoffs (launch-registry, list-growth-designer, newsletter-monetization-planner) are restated across the intro, Scope guard, Skill Contract, Instructions, and Reference Materials, which is genuine padding that could be tightened.

2 / 3

Actionability

As an instruction-only design skill it gives concrete, specific directives — quantified criteria (core-flow completion rate, structured-feedback count, error tolerance vs trailing rate), a 5-10%-per-wave invite pattern, exact memory paths, and explicit registry-events.py propose calls — which is actionable rather than abstract or pseudocode.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

An 8-step sequence has explicit checkpoints: step 1 pulls and forbids contradicting the existing record, every threshold is labeled Estimated until validated, a 'Done when' checklist enumerates completion, and the destructive registry write is guarded ('never writes memory/launch-registry/ directly', 'ask before writing').

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist; the body is a well-organized overview (Quick Start, Skill Contract, Data Sources, Instructions, Reference Materials, Next Best Skill) with one-level-deep, clearly signaled links to sibling skills and shared docs and no nested reference chains, meeting the well-organized-sections bar.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Description

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific, trigger-rich, complete (explicit what and when), and well-differentiated via explicit out-scope carve-outs naming the adjacent skills. It is slightly long but every clause carries load rather than padding.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — the waitlist→concept→alpha→beta→GA stage ladder, quantified graduation criteria, cohort-gating/invite-throttling, feedback-loop spec with notify-on-status-change, and referral mechanics (invite codes, anti-abuse) — matching the 'multiple specific concrete actions' anchor.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ('produces a waitlist→concept→alpha→beta→GA stage ladder...') and when ('Use when the user asks to...'), satisfying the clear-what-and-explicit-trigger anchor rather than the implied-when level.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Explicit quoted triggers users would naturally say ('design an early access program', 'set up a waitlist and beta stages', 'define beta graduation criteria') plus a bilingual keyword tail (waitlist/内测阶梯/抢先体验/毕业标准/反馈闭环) give good natural-term coverage.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Explicit negative scope carves out adjacent skills ('Not for waitlist acquisition strategy... use list-growth-designer; not for the canonical stage record — use launch-registry'), giving it a clear niche unlikely to trigger the wrong skill.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

81%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation13 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_field

'metadata' should map string keys to string values

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

relative_links

Relative link issues: 29 suspicious

Warning

Total

13

/

16

Passed

Repository
aaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.