Conciseness

The body is largely free of concepts Claude already knows, but the same guardrail is restated several times — "not a Suitability score and never enters the SQS" appears in the intro, step 3, step 6, and the compact example — which is padding that could be tightened. It is above level 1 because it does not explain basic concepts, but not level 3 due to the redundancy.

Actionability

It gives one concrete executable command (`python3 ...youtube.py videos @handle --limit 10`), exact save paths, and a specific typed-field checklist (target, rollup_id, assessment_time, catalog_version) with a NEEDS_INPUT return. However, the actual scoring tables and Suitability item definitions are delegated to referenced files rather than present inline, so the body's guidance is concrete but incomplete on its own.

Workflow Clarity

The 8-step Instructions are clearly sequenced with explicit validation gates — step 1 returns NEEDS_INPUT and preserves identity for resume, step 2 forbids softening Unknown to Fail/Partial, step 4 holds outreach on qualifying Fail evidence — plus a "Done when" checklist. This matches the anchor for a clear sequence with explicit validation steps and a checklist, exceeding the level-2 implicit-checkpoint case.

Progressive Disclosure

The body is a clean overview (Quick Start, Skill Contract, Data Sources, Instructions, Compact Example, Reference Materials, Next Best Skill) with well-signaled one-level references; the in-bundle reference references/scoring-templates.md is a real file and clearly labeled. It avoids the level-2 case of inline content that should be split, since detailed scoring tables are correctly pushed to references.

Specificity

It names multiple concrete actions — "produces the typed STAR Suitability (S) read plus a separately labeled campaign-fit ranking" — rather than vague abstractions, matching the anchor for listing several specific concrete actions. It avoids the level-2 partial-coverage case by stating both outputs explicitly.

Completeness

It clearly answers both what (produces the Suitability read plus a separate campaign-fit ranking) and when (an explicit "Use when the user asks to..." trigger clause). It is above level 2 because the when is explicit, not merely implied, and below scale max only by being a 1–3 scale.

Trigger Term Quality

It quotes natural user phrasing — "score this influencer", "rank these creators for our campaign", "tell me which influencer is the best fit" — giving good coverage of terms a user would actually say. It is not the level-2 case of relevant-but-incomplete keywords because it supplies several common variations.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

It states explicit negative boundaries — "Not for finding new influencers — use influencer-discovery; not for sending outreach — use outreach-manager" — carving a clear niche unlikely to fire for the wrong skill. This exceeds the level-2 overlap case by naming sibling skills to defer to.