Content
73%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable playbook with an unusually strong validation discipline (reuse gate, NEEDS_INPUT handling, done-when checklist). Its main weakness is token efficiency — the rights-gating rule is repeated many times — and a set of cross-bundle references that cannot be verified within the provided files.
Suggestions
State the creator-reuse gate fully once in its dedicated paragraph and have steps 2, 4, 6, and 7 reference it in a single clause ('subject to the reuse gate above') instead of restating the field list.
Consolidate the duplicated rights/approval language between the Skill Contract 'Reads'/'Done when' entries and the Data Sources paragraph into one normative section.
Ensure cross-referenced files (skill-contract.md, CONNECTORS.md, sibling SKILL.md files) are included in the bundle or clearly marked as external to avoid dead links when the skill is distributed standalone.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The core marketing guidance (message match, layout, promo-code UX, A/B testing) is tight, but the creator-reuse rights gate is restated roughly five times across the Skill Contract, Data Sources, the 'Creator-reuse gate' paragraph, and steps 2, 4, 6, and 7. This is more repetition than the 'minor trimming' of score 4 but falls short of the 'several unnecessary explanations or padded sections' of score 2. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives concrete, executable guidance: the named layout 'hero → social proof → product → more proof → FAQ → final CTA', promo-code 'auto-apply via URL param, prominent display, confirmation', specific metrics, and per-step fill-in templates in the real references/templates.md. Some of the body is contract/save-path boilerplate rather than marketing instruction, keeping it below the fully copy-paste-ready bar of score 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Eight clearly sequenced steps with explicit validation: the creator-reuse gate with field-by-field checks, NEEDS_INPUT failure handling with a documented fallback ('You may still audit non-creator page elements... with opaque snapshot refs'), a 'Done when' completion checklist, and an advisory output rubric check. This matches the anchor for clear sequence with explicit validation, error-recovery feedback, and checklists. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The heavy detail (templates, ASCII layouts, HTML snippets, worked example) is properly split one level deep into the real references/templates.md, keyed by step numbers and clearly described. However, several referenced paths (skill-contract.md, state-model.md, CONNECTORS.md, conversion-quality.md, sibling SKILL.md files) lie outside the provided bundle, a minor navigation gap that keeps it below the top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |