Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable process skill with a clear sequenced workflow, validation checkpoints, and clean one-level-deep reference navigation. The main weakness is repetition — the registry-write boilerplate and the three-skill handoff triad each recur many times and could be consolidated to recover tokens.
Suggestions
Consolidate the 'via an authorized `operation: propose` request to `registry-events.py`' phrase: state the rule once in the Skill Contract, then reference it briefly ('propose to registry-events.py') at each write step instead of repeating the full clause ~7 times.
State the roi-calculator / report-generator / performance-analyzer handoff triad once in the Scope guard and link from Reference Materials; drop the re-listing in Next Best Skill to remove the 4th repetition.
Trim justificatory asides like 'a 5-Whys per table row is retro paralysis, the failure mode this constraint exists to prevent' to the operative constraint ('one miss, one chain') to tighten the Instructions without losing the rule.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body assumes Claude's competence (no basic-concept explanations) and is information-dense, but the phrase 'via an authorized `operation: propose` request to `registry-events.py`' repeats ~7 times and the roi-calculator / report-generator / performance-analyzer handoff triad repeats ~4 times (scope guard, reference materials, next best skill), so not every token earns its place — matching the 'could be tightened' score-2 anchor rather than the lean score-3 anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The 7-step Instructions give concrete, executable guidance with real paths ('memory/events/launches.ndjson', 'registry-events.py'), named connectors ('scripts/connectors/hn.py', 'producthunt.py'), and a specific labeling scheme ('Measured / User-provided / Estimated'); per the scoring notes, absence of runnable code in an instruction-only skill is not penalized when guidance is this actionable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered 7-step sequence is paired with a 'Done when' completion checklist, a NEEDS_INPUT feedback loop on missing targets, and gated safety checks ('never writes registry records directly', 'Ask before persisting'), satisfying the score-3 anchor of explicit validation steps and feedback loops for a risky registry-write operation. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is organized into clear sections (Quick Start, Skill Contract, Data Sources, Instructions, Reference Materials, Next Best Skill) with a dedicated, purpose-annotated Reference Materials list pointing one level deep to ramp-benchmark.md, skill-contract.md, CONNECTORS.md, SECURITY.md and sibling SKILL.md files; no bundle files are present to verify, so per the rubric note this is scored on references alone, which are well-signaled and easy to navigate. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |