Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable orchestration skill: clear step sequence with validation gates, concrete paths and deliverable specs, and a clean one-level reference layer. The main weakness is conciseness — several disclaimers and routing phrases repeat verbatim across sections and could be consolidated.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated "via an authorized `operation: propose` request to `registry-events.py`" boilerplate into a single defined step or reference, then cite it by name instead of restating it in steps 3, 6, and Save Results.
Merge the intro scope-guard sentence list with the "Scope guard" paragraph so each negative boundary (launch-day-conductor, content-writer, sales-enablement-kit, offer-claims-registry) is stated once rather than twice.
Define the claim-adjudication rule ("this skill decides wording, never substantiation") once in the Skill Contract and refer back to it instead of restating it in the intro, instructions, and Save Results.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is operationally dense and avoids explaining known concepts, but the phrase "via an authorized `operation: propose` request to `registry-events.py`" repeats verbatim ~5 times and the claim-adjudication disclaimer plus negative-routing boundaries recur across the intro, scope guard, and instructions, so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance throughout — exact lengths (10s/30s/2min, 25/50/100-word), exact file paths (memory/narrative-registry/canon.md, memory/claims/claims-ledger.md), exact event routes (memory/events/claims.ndjson), and labeled claim categories (Measured / User-provided / [needs source]); per the rubric, absence of code in an instruction-only skill is not penalized when guidance is this actionable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-step numbered sequence with explicit validation checkpoints — step 1 verifies the canon exists and stops with NEEDS_INPUT if missing, a 3-part "Done when" checklist, a pre-publish handoff, and termination rules (visited-set, max-depth:3, ambiguity stop). | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files are present, but the body is well-organized into clear sections (Quick Start, Skill Contract, Data Sources, Instructions, Save Results, Reference Materials, Next Best Skill) and the Reference Materials list is one level deep with no nested references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |