Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with a clear, checkpointed workflow and clean one-level-deep references. The main drag is conciseness: the critical scope boundary (hand N-sub-item facts to their owners, do not score them here) is restated six or more times, inflating the body without adding clarity.
Suggestions
State the 'do not author N sub-item notes / hand the facts to email-sequence-designer and preference-frequency-manager' boundary once canonically (e.g., in step 7) and reference it from the intro, Skill Contract, Scope guard, Save Results, and Next Best Skill instead of restating it each time.
Fold the Scope guard paragraph's unique content (the EQS/veto boundary with email-quality-auditor) into step 7 and drop the paragraph, since the rest restates the intro and step 7 verbatim.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Content is accurate and domain-specific (not basic-concept padding that would warrant a 1), but the 'do not author N sub-item notes / hand facts to their owners' boundary is restated across the intro, Skill Contract, step 7, Scope guard, Save Results, References, and Next Best Skill — could be tightened to one canonical statement. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Gives concrete, specific, copy-paste-ready guidance — exact profile weights (0.15/0.30/0.15/0.20), 'no open in 90 days, no click in 180', 'cap the reactivation touches (typically 3–4)' — and per the scoring notes the absence of code in this instruction-only skill is not penalized because the guidance is actionable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A numbered 7-step sequence is paired with explicit Decision Gates (stop-and-ask vs continue-silently) as validation checkpoints, a 'Done when' completion checklist, and an auditor-BLOCK repair feedback loop, matching the level-3 anchor rather than the checkpoint-missing level 2. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized and the handoff schema and SEND benchmarks are referenced one level deep (skill-contract.md, send-benchmark.md, CONNECTORS.md, SECURITY.md) in a dedicated Reference Materials section rather than inlined, matching the level-3 'clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references' anchor; no bundle files exist to evaluate further. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |