Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable body with a clear sequenced workflow, validation checkpoints, and clean one-level references. The only weakness is moderate redundancy: the proxy-labeling red line and registry proposal path are restated in several sections.
Suggestions
State the proxy-labeling red line and the registry 'operation: propose' write path once (e.g., in the Skill Contract or Instructions) and reference back rather than restating them in Scope guard, Data Sources, Instructions steps 3/6/7, and Save Results.
The repeated closed-platform list (X/IG/TikTok/LinkedIn/小红书/微信公众号/视频号/抖音) appears in the Scope guard, Data Sources, and Instructions step 6 — consolidate into the coverage-disclosure step and point to it.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense and free of generic concepts Claude already knows, but the proxy-labeling red line and the registry 'operation: propose' path are restated across the Scope guard, Data Sources, Instructions (steps 3/6/7), and Save Results sections — some tightening would remove redundancy. Not a 3 because the repetition is non-trivial; not a 1 because nothing is padded with known concepts. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Executable throughout: named connector scripts (hn.py, bluesky.py, gdelt.py with '≥5s between calls'), a concrete spike threshold ('current day > 2× the 7-day median'), six triage classes each with a named routing target and SLA, and explicit write paths under memory/social/social-pulse-monitor/. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | An 8-step numbered sequence with explicit checkpoints: a 'Done when' criterion, the coverage-disclosure table as a verification step, and an idempotent propose-only registry write path. Validation/feedback for the risky batch-write operation is present (never edit the stream directly; channel-registry resolves proposals). | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Overview body points to one-level-deep, clearly signaled references — CONNECTORS.md, SECURITY.md, echo-benchmark.md, skill-contract.md, and sibling SKILL.md files — gathered in a Reference Materials list. No local bundle files exist to verify, but the reference structure is clean and shallow. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |