Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, highly actionable planning workflow with explicit validation and feedback loops and clean progressive disclosure into verified reference files. Its only weakness is minor verbosity from repeated helper-invocation prose and a dense configuration table.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense operational guidance that assumes Claude's competence with no basic-concept padding, but the evidence-provenance helper invocation is repeated across Hard rules, Phase 4, Phase 5, and Deepen, and the Configuration 'Meaning' column is verbose — minor trims are available. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete analyzer-runner commands, exact tool-call signatures (query, context, impact, trace), normalized plan-path formats, and helper subcommands (write-plan, read-plan) give copy-paste-ready, executable guidance across the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced Phase 0–5 plus Deepen workflow carries explicit validation checkpoints (freshness gate, analyzer provenance check, source verification) and feedback loops (graph/source disagreement, safe-write failure, stale-analyzer limitation); the skill is non-destructive and guards its only state changes. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The overview body points to one-level-deep references (context-ledger, pdg-slice, plan-template, context-pack, evidence-provenance) and the evidence-provenance script, all of which exist as real files with clearly signaled relative paths, keeping detail appropriately split out. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |