Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The adapter body is concise and well-structured, with clear lane sequencing and an explicit validation hard gate at lane 7. Its only weakness is that the bulk of executable detail lives in an external orchestration.md that is not bundled with this skill.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean: a one-line purpose, a short distinction blockquote, the command, and four tight bullets pinning only the Claude-Code specifics, with every token earning its place and no concept over-explanation. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives concrete, executable adapter guidance (dispatch each lane via the Agent tool; lanes 1-2 then 3-6 parallel then 7) but delegates the bulk of executable detail to an external orchestration.md, leaving minor gaps — matches anchor 4. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequencing is explicit (lanes 1-2 first, 3-6 parallel, lane 7 last on the draft) and includes a hard-gate validation checkpoint with a feedback loop ('revise and re-run it' until the Required corrections section is empty). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-structured overview that delegates the canonical contract to a clearly signaled, one-level-deep reference (pr-swarm-review/orchestration.md) plus persona files; the referenced paths are not bundled locally, leaving a minor organization gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |