Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, mostly lean reference with concrete executable tool calls and checklists that include validation steps. It is held below 5 by minor verbosity, slightly implicit error-recovery loops, and the absence of a layered reference structure (which this single-file skill does not strictly require).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and example-driven with almost no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; only minor instances (e.g. brief prose around tool definitions) could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides concrete, executable tool invocations with realistic argument shapes and outputs (rename, impact, detect_changes, cypher), covering common cases; minor gaps exist around exact response field semantics. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Numbered workflows and per-refactor checklists are clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints (dry_run preview, detect_changes, 'Run tests'), though the destructive/batch feedback loop is implied rather than a strict validate→fix→retry cycle. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well organized into clearly labeled sections (When to Use, Workflow, Checklists, Tools, Risk Rules, Example) with no external bundle files needed; it is a single self-contained overview rather than a multi-file structure, so it sits just below the multi-reference anchor of 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |