Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Excellent body: concise, fully actionable, with strong validation feedback loops for destructive refactors and clear section structure. Nothing significant to improve.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient; assumes Claude's competence, explains only non-obvious traps (binding identity, partial/truncated flags, wrong-worktree zero), every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable tool calls with arguments and return shapes, per-operation checklists, and a worked end-to-end rename example; copy-paste ready. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Destructive/batch operation with explicit dry_run preview gate, identity confirmation, detect_changes verification, and a partial/truncated re-run feedback loop, plus checklists for each refactor type. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files present; the ~160-line body is well-organized with clear section headers and no nested references, fitting the simple-skill exception for a 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 20 / 20 Passed |