Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with a clear, validated workflow and concrete commands throughout. Its main weaknesses are minor redundancy across sections and a fully inline monolithic structure with no progressive disclosure of reference material.
Suggestions
De-duplicate the keyboard shortcuts between the navigation table (§3) and the shortcuts table (§9), keeping one canonical reference and cross-linking.
State the canvas-app / DOM-unreliability caveat once (Overview) and reference it rather than repeating it in §12.
Consider moving the large reference tables (menus §8, shortcuts §9, formulas §5) into a bundled reference file to better separate quick-start guidance from lookup material.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Largely token-efficient reference tables and command lists, but it repeats some content across sections (e.g., shortcuts in both navigation and shortcuts tables, the canvas-app caveat stated twice) and could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, copy-ready guidance: exact shortcuts (Cmd+Home, Cmd+End), menu paths (Format > Number), numbered entry patterns, and concrete formula examples (=SUM(A1:A10)). | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | An explicit ordered "Agent Workflow" with a Verify checkpoint plus a dedicated error-recovery feedback loop (Undo → screenshot → re-orient → re-read → retry) gives clear sequencing with validation. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single well-organized monolithic file with no bundle files; at ~280 lines the inline reference tables (menus, shortcuts, formulas) could be split out, so structure is good but content that could be separate stays inline. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |