Content
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, highly actionable reference with executable commands, well-sequenced workflows including verification steps, and explicit error-recovery guidance; its only real weakness is that substantial detail is kept inline with no external reference files to split it across.
Suggestions
Move the per-product worked examples (Sheets/Docs/Slides create-append-read cycles) into a separate references file (e.g., references/workflows.md) and link to it from a concise overview.
Add a one-line pointer at the top indicating where detailed workflow and scope rules live, so the SKILL.md body serves as a true overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense reference-style content built from operational tables and tight command blocks with almost no concept-explanation padding; nearly every line is operational and earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable MCP tool invocations with exact argument syntax and worked Sheets/Docs/Slides examples that are copy-paste ready (placeholders aside). | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Each product workflow is explicitly numbered and closes with a 'read back to verify' checkpoint, and the Error Handling section maps HTTP codes to causes plus recovery actions, providing explicit validation and a feedback path. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle/reference files exist and the ~130-line body keeps per-product worked examples inline that a progressive-disclosure design would factor into separate reference files, despite otherwise clear header organization. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |