Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An excellent orchestration skill: concrete, executable, and well-sequenced, with clean progressive disclosure into four real and well-matched reference files. The only flaw is minor intra-document redundancy between the intro paragraph and the synthesis step.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient, operational, and free of concept explanations Claude already knows, but contains minor trimmable redundancy — e.g., the intro's "Agreement across models is high-confidence signal; lone-model findings are worth reading but lower confidence" repeats Step 4's consensus/lone-model weighting. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance throughout: a concrete command (`git diff main...HEAD`), exact spawn parameters (`subagent_type: pstack:readonly-agent`, model list handling), a model-slug fallback procedure, a numbered template-fill list, and an exact output structure — all four referenced files exist and match their described purposes. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Five unambiguously sequenced steps with explicit checkpoints (ask the user before proceeding if intent is unclear; substitute the closest valid model slug on spawn failure) and clearly defined synthesis and categorization procedures. The workflow is read-only with "Do NOT auto-apply changes", so the destructive/batch validation cap does not apply. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The SKILL.md is a concise process overview with well-signaled, one-level-deep references (reviewer-prompt.md, rubric.md, code-quality-review.md, lead-judgment.md) that all exist, are appropriately split out, and are navigated to with clear "Read X and fill in the template" / "Read X for the full framework" instructions. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |