Conciseness

Mostly efficient instructional content, but padded with motivational aphorisms ("Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication", "Show people the future — don't just give them better horses"), a personality-coaching Tone section, and clear redundancy ("Red Flags" largely duplicates "Anti-patterns to Avoid", and "How It Works" restates "Process"); not 4 because the redundancy is more than minor, not 2 because substantial genuine guidance remains.

Actionability

Provides concrete executable guidance — named ideation lenses (Inversion, Constraint removal, etc.), a specific 3-5 question budget, a copy-paste markdown output template, named tools (AskUserQuestion, Glob, Grep, Read), and a real init script; not 5 because the referenced detail files that hold 'additional frameworks' and 'the full evaluation rubric' are missing, so the complete actionable detail is not actually present.

Workflow Clarity

Three phases are clearly sequenced with explicit gating ("Do NOT proceed until you understand who this is for"), a defined transition ("After the user reacts..."), user-confirmation before saving, and a final Verification checklist; not 5 because there is no explicit error-recovery/feedback loop and the adaptive conversational nature makes checkpoints soft rather than rigidly validated.

Progressive Disclosure

References are well-signaled and one level deep in context ("Read frameworks.md... for additional ideation frameworks", "Read refinement-criteria.md... for the full evaluation rubric", "Read examples.md... for examples"), but none of these three files exist in the bundle (only scripts/idea-refine.sh is present), so navigation dead-ends; the signaling quality approaches 4 but the broken referenced paths drag it back to the 'could be better organized' level.

Specificity

Names the ideation domain plus several concrete actions ("Refines raw ideas into sharp, actionable concepts", "stress-test assumptions", "expand options before converging"), matching the 'several specific actions; minor gaps' anchor; not 5 because the actions stay abstract rather than crisply enumerated like the PDF examples, and not 3 because more than 1-2 concrete actions are given.

Completeness

Explicitly answers both 'what' ("Refines raw ideas into sharp, actionable concepts through structured divergent and convergent thinking") and 'when' ("Use when an idea is still vague... or when you want to expand options... Triggers on...") with concrete trigger phrases, matching the top anchor exactly; cannot exceed 5.

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural phrases a user would say ("ideate", "refine this idea", "stress-test my plan", "stress-test assumptions", "expand options") with good coverage; not 5 because the explicit trigger set is limited to three phrases and lacks the synonym breadth of the top anchor, and not 3 because the terms are natural and varied rather than minimal.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Ideation/refinement is a clear niche with distinct triggers, but "stress-test my plan" and the planning framing create minor overlap risk with general planning or review skills, placing it just below the minimal-conflict top anchor and above the 'could still overlap' midpoint.