Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-sequenced, actionable workflow with explicit validation checkpoints and a final gate, supported by real one-level-deep references. It is concise and assumes Claude's competence, with only minor tightening possible in the denser list sections.
Suggestions
Tighten the section 6 outcome-class ladder and the section 'Final validation gate' checklist into more compact phrasing to lift conciseness toward a 5.
Consider moving the synthetic micro-example in section 3 into the worked-example reference to keep the main body focused on instruction.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is largely lean — templates, a compact do/don't pair, and a calibration micro-example earn their place — but a few list-heavy sections (e.g., the outcome-class ladder and the final-gate checklist) could be tightened slightly; not a 5 because minor padding remains. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready structures (evidence ledger columns, narrative-spine formula, one-sentence draft template, six-tier outcome hierarchy, full output scaffolding) plus a concrete synthetic micro-example; per the scoring notes, absence of code in an instruction-only skill is not penalized when guidance is this actionable. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Seven numbered steps form a clear sequence with an explicit mid-process 'Checkpoint', a feedback loop ('If the spine is weak, return to the evidence ledger...'), and a final validation-gate checklist with error-recovery ('If a check fails... revise it, and run the gate again'). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | SKILL.md is an overview that contextually signals three one-level-deep references (evidence-and-claims.md, story-architecture.md, worked-example.md) — all verified to exist — with detail appropriately split out and easy navigation. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |