Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-architected methodology skill: concise and non-redundant, actionably templated, clearly sequenced with an explicit feedback checkpoint, and cleanly split across one-level-deep reference files. It exemplifies the rubric's good-content patterns.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and terse throughout — imperative bullet lists, table schemas, and synthetic examples — and never explains concepts Claude already knows (no 'what is a design token' filler); every section earns its place, matching the score-5 'lean and efficient' anchor over the 4-anchor which expects trimmable over-explanation. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | As an instruction-only skill it supplies concrete, copy-paste-ready structures: evidence-inventory column schemas, health-summary and finding table formats with synthetic examples, a worked-example reference, and a sequencing framework — actionable guidance with no major gaps, so it sits at 5 rather than 4. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear six-step sequence (define boundary → inventory → review layers → diagnose → calibrate → produce) plus a Stabilize/Consolidate/Adopt/Evolve sequence and an explicit Checkpoint feedback loop ('repeat until every Quality-bar item passes'), with the Quality bar as a validation checklist; this matches the score-5 anchor and is not a destructive/batch skill so no cap applies. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview that delegates layer detail to four clearly signaled, one-level-deep references (tokens-and-theming.md, component-contract.md, governance-and-adoption.md, worked-example.md), all of which exist in ./references/, matching the score-5 'clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 20 / 20 Passed |