Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, highly actionable audit skill with executable commands, a clear three-step workflow, and good error-handling guidance. The only slack is redundant 'When to Use'/'Limitations' boilerplate and a missing explicit validation checkpoint in the main flow.
Suggestions
Remove or compress the 'When to Use' section since it restates the description verbatim.
Add an explicit validation checkpoint after the audit command (e.g. 'confirm the JSON is valid before building the report').
Trim the generic 'Limitations' boilerplate to the one risk specific to this skill (auditing is read-only; fixes need re-verification).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The core (Audit/Report/Tear down, Gotchas) is lean and assumes competence, but the 'When to Use' section duplicates the description verbatim and 'Limitations' is generic boilerplate that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste-ready bash for launching the audit and tearing it down, plus concrete flags, a structured report schema (where/evidence/fix), and decoded exit codes — fully executable. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear Audit→Report→Tear down sequence with a 're-run to verify' feedback loop and exit-2 error recovery, but the main flow lacks an explicit validate step between audit output and reporting. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external references and well-organized numbered sections, satisfying the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |