Content
63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-sequenced, actionable instruction skill with explicit thresholds, formulas, rollback rules, and uncertainty guardrails — strong on actionability and workflow clarity. Its main weaknesses are an editorial opening and duplicated trigger lists that pad the token budget, and a monolithic single-file structure with no progressive disclosure despite being long enough to warrant reference files.
Suggestions
Cut the editorial "Core principle" paragraph and deduplicate the "When to Use" and "Examples" lists into a single trigger section to recover tokens.
Move the Phase 5 output-format template and the 2D statistical-significance method detail into separate reference files (e.g. references/output-template.md, references/significance-methods.md) and link to them one level deep.
Add an explicit validate→fix→retry loop for the budget-reallocation step (e.g., re-run the diagnostics after any reallocation and confirm CPA moved within the predicted interval before further changes).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient — dense template tables and formulas assume Claude's competence and avoid explaining basics like ROAS — but the editorial "Core principle" paragraph and near-duplicate "When to Use" (11 items) and "Examples" (10 items) lists are noticeable padding that could be trimmed. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete formulas (Channel CAC = CPA ÷ (MQL rate × SQL rate × Close rate)), explicit thresholds (CPA > 3x target, CTR < 50% of campaign average), a structured significance-test template, and a full output scaffold — actionable guidance with only minor gaps from the placeholder template rows. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Phases 0–5 are clearly sequenced with checkpoints (non-comparable channels flagged, uncertainty validated before action, bounded tests with predefined stop/rollback rules, confirm-before-write); falls short of 5 only because the validate→fix→retry feedback loop is implicit rather than an explicit re-run step. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the ~370-line skill is a single monolithic document; sections are well-organized, but the long Phase 5 output template and statistical-method detail that clearly belong in separate reference files are inlined with no one-level-deep references signaled. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |