CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

agentfolio

Skill for discovering and researching autonomous AI agents, tools, and ecosystems using the AgentFolio directory.

53

Quality

60%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills/skills/agentfolio/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is agentfolio in sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is well-structured and actionable for a research/directory skill, with concrete workflows and ready-to-use prompts. The main weakness is redundancy across the Capabilities, intro, and When to Use sections that inflates token cost without adding guidance.

Suggestions

Merge the Capabilities list, the intro 'helps you' bullets, and the When to Use section into one consolidated list to remove overlapping restatements.

Add a short validation/sanity step (e.g., confirm an AgentFolio entry still exists and matches the claimed category before relying on it) to strengthen workflow_clarity.

Consider splitting the three Example Workflows into a separate references file once the skill grows, keeping SKILL.md as a lean overview.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but the Capabilities list, the intro 'helps you' list, and the When to Use section overlap materially and could be tightened, matching 'mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation'.

3 / 5

Actionability

As an instruction-only skill it gives concrete, executable guidance: specific search keywords, defined capture fields (core promise, I/O shape, autonomy model, deployment model), and copy-paste-ready example prompts; only minor gaps keep it from a 5.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

How to Use lays out a clear four-step sequence (Open → Search by intent → Evaluate candidates → Synthesize) with well-defined sub-steps; no validation checkpoints are needed for read-only research, so this is a clear sequence with minor gaps rather than a 5.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The single SKILL.md is well-organized into clearly labeled sections (Capabilities, How to Use, Example Workflows, Example Prompts, When to Use); with no bundle files this is good structure with minor organization gaps, not the ideal one-level-deep reference split of a 5.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

53%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description conveys a clear purpose and a reasonably distinct niche, but it omits an explicit 'when to use' trigger clause and lacks breadth of natural trigger terms. Adding a 'Use when...' clause with synonyms would lift the completeness and trigger_term scores.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause, e.g. 'Use when discovering or comparing autonomous AI agents, agent frameworks, or hosted agent products.'

Broaden trigger terms with synonyms users naturally say ('agent frameworks', 'AI assistants', 'agent products', 'agent directory').

Expand the action list beyond 'discovering and researching' to concrete verbs like 'compare, shortlist, and benchmark agents'.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the domain and two concrete actions ('discovering and researching') plus 'autonomous AI agents, tools, and ecosystems', but the action set is not comprehensive, matching the 1-2 concrete actions anchor rather than the multi-action 5.

3 / 5

Completeness

It clearly states what the skill does (discover and research agents via AgentFolio) but lacks any explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause; per the guideline a missing trigger clause caps completeness at 3.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

It includes a relevant natural term ('autonomous AI agents') but misses common variations or synonyms users might say (e.g., 'agent frameworks', 'AI assistants', 'agent directory'), fitting the 'some relevant keywords but missing common variations' anchor.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Tying the skill to the specific 'AgentFolio directory' and 'autonomous AI agents' niche makes it mostly distinct with only minor overlap risk against generic research skills.

4 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.