Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is lean and highly actionable with copy-paste commands and a sensible before/after/audit workflow; the only gap is a missing explicit post-stamp verification checkpoint.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean, command-driven body that assumes Claude's competence — the one-line EXIF/ID3 analogy and short evidence list earn their place, and there is no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands cover the common cases — stamp/read/inspect/audit with concrete flags, evidence examples, classification labels, and install instructions. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear before/after/audit sequence with pre-modification checkpoints ('akf read', 'akf inspect' before modifying), but no explicit post-stamp verification or feedback loop, leaving a minor validation gap versus the 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no bundle files needed and well-organized sections (When to Use, After creating, Before modifying, Compliance, Classification, Install, Links), so per the simple-skill guidance it scores 5 on structure alone. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |