CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

apify-brand-reputation-monitoring

Scrape reviews, ratings, and brand mentions from multiple platforms using Apify Actors.

58

Quality

67%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills/skills/apify-brand-reputation-monitoring/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is apify-brand-reputation-monitoring in sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is concise and mostly actionable with a clear five-step workflow, but the batch scraping operation lacks explicit validation checkpoints (capping workflow clarity at 3) and references a script absent from the bundle.

Suggestions

Add an explicit validation/verification step before saving results, e.g., 'Verify results count > 0 and output file exists before reporting success', to lift workflow clarity above 3.

Ship the referenced run_actor.js in a scripts/ bundle (or provide the script inline) so the commands are fully copy-paste executable.

Remove the '(No need to check it upfront)' aside and clarify 'Based on character of use case' to tighten conciseness.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean with a checklist, compact selection table, short command blocks, and no padding about what Apify/Actors/reviews are; minor trim opportunities like '(No need to check it upfront)' keep it just below 5.

4 / 5

Actionability

Concrete, near copy-paste bash commands for schema fetching and three output formats are provided, but ACTOR_ID/JSON_INPUT are placeholders and the referenced run_actor.js script is absent from the bundle, so it is not fully copy-paste ready.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Steps 1-5 are clearly sequenced with a copyable progress checklist, but this batch scraping workflow has no validation/verification checkpoint, which caps workflow clarity at 3 per the rubric.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The single-file body is well-sectioned (Prerequisites, Workflow substeps, Error Handling), but it references a run_actor.js script that does not exist in the provided bundle, a minor organization gap keeping it below 5.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

66%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly communicates what the skill does with concrete, natural keywords, but omits any explicit 'Use when...' trigger guidance, capping completeness at 3. It is specific and distinct but not comprehensive or trigger-complete.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause (e.g., 'Use when the user wants to monitor brand reputation, scrape reviews or ratings across platforms, or track brand mentions').

Include natural synonyms and concrete trigger phrases users would say, such as 'review scraper', 'sentiment monitoring', or platform names like Google Maps and Booking.com.

Broaden the action verbs beyond 'scrape' (e.g., export, summarize, compare ratings) to make coverage more comprehensive.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists several concrete scrape actions (reviews, ratings, brand mentions) across named platforms via Apify Actors, fitting the 'several specific actions, minor gaps' anchor; not a 5 since coverage is not comprehensive and 'scrape' is one verb repeated.

4 / 5

Completeness

The 'what' is clearly and specifically stated, but there is no 'when'/'Use when...' trigger clause, which the guidelines cap at 3.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural user terms like 'reviews', 'ratings', and 'brand mentions' give good keyword coverage, but common synonyms and explicit 'Use when...' phrasing are missing, so it sits below 5.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The 'using Apify Actors' qualifier plus brand/review scraping gives a clear niche with minor overlap risk against generic Apify scrapers; lacks an explicit distinct trigger clause so it does not reach 5.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.