Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable instruction skill with a clear multi-step workflow and concrete question templates; it is efficient and organized, with only minor verbosity and no explicit retry/validation loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient with numbered steps and templates and no padding about concepts Claude already knows, but the verbose bullet on bolding recommended choices and the 7-item 'make questions easy to answer' list could be trimmed, fitting the efficient-with-minor-over-explanation anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides concrete, executable guidance — numbered 1-5 question caps, multiple-choice templates, a full reply-format code block, and example question strings — with only minor gaps, matching the mostly-executable anchor; it stops short of 5 because guidance is instructional rather than copy-paste code covering all common cases. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The four-step workflow (decide underspecified, ask must-have questions, pause before acting, confirm and proceed) is clearly sequenced with a pause-checkpoint and confirmation loop, but lacks an explicit validate-and-retry feedback loop, matching the clear-sequence-most-checkpoints anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The single self-contained file is well-organized with clear headers (When to Use / NOT to Use, Goal, Workflow, templates, Anti-patterns) and no nested references, but at ~80 lines it exceeds the under-50-line simple-skill exception that would allow a 5 on structure alone, placing it at good-structure with minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |