CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

azure-communication-chat-java

Build real-time chat applications with thread management, messaging, participants, and read receipts.

60

Quality

71%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills/skills/azure-communication-chat-java/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is azure-communication-chat-java in sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

76%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is highly actionable with comprehensive executable Java examples and tight, well-organized sections. Its main weaknesses are the absence of explicit validation checkpoints around destructive operations and the lack of any progressive-disclosure file split.

Suggestions

Add explicit validation checkpoints before destructive calls (e.g., confirm thread/message existence and verify the operation succeeded) to raise workflow clarity above 3.

Move the full Message Types table and pagination/API detail into a separate reference file linked from the body, keeping the overview lean.

Remove the verbatim repetition of the description as the opening body line to tighten conciseness.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly lean, executable code with no over-explanation of known concepts; minor trim opportunities exist in the repeated tagline and the Trigger Phrases section.

4 / 5

Actionability

It provides copy-paste-ready Java code with imports, a versioned dependency, and concrete examples spanning client creation, messaging, participants, receipts, pagination, and error handling across the common cases.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Operations are individually clear and an error-handling section exists, but destructive/batch operations (deleteChatThread, deleteMessage) lack explicit validate-before-proceed checkpoints, which caps workflow clarity at 3.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist; the self-contained SKILL.md is well-organized into clearly headed sections and is easy to navigate, though some reference material could be split into separate files.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

66%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and uses natural trigger terms, but it omits any explicit "Use when..." guidance, which limits completeness. It is clearly scoped to Azure Communication Chat functionality with low conflict risk.

Suggestions

Add a 'Use when ...' clause naming the trigger conditions (e.g., "Use when building Java chat apps with Azure Communication Services, or when the user mentions chat threads, participants, or read receipts.")

Include the platform/SDK name ("Azure Communication Services") so the description surfaces for service-specific requests.

Add a synonym or two (e.g., "instant messaging") to broaden natural trigger coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the domain and several concrete actions — "thread management, messaging, participants, and read receipts" — listing multiple specific capabilities with only minor coverage gaps.

4 / 5

Completeness

It gives a clear "what" but no "Use when..." or equivalent trigger guidance in the description itself, which per the rubric caps completeness at 3.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

It includes natural terms a user would say ("real-time chat applications", "chat", "messaging", "read receipts", "participants") with good coverage, though it omits the platform name and synonyms.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The real-time chat niche with threads, participants, and read receipts is mostly distinct from other skills, with only minor overlap risk against generic chat tooling.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.