Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, token-efficient constraints catalog that gives concrete, actionable rules across UI domains. It is strongest in conciseness and could improve by adding a brief applied example and an explicit review-validation checkpoint.
Suggestions
Add one short before/after markup example illustrating a corrected component (e.g. an icon-only button with aria-label) to lift actionability from rules to applied guidance.
For the `/baseline-ui <file>` flow, add an explicit checkpoint such as 'confirm each violation against the constraint list before proposing fixes' to strengthen workflow validation.
Consider splitting the long Animation/Design rule lists into a referenced file only if the catalog grows further; at current size inline placement is appropriate.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | A lean catalog of MUST/SHOULD/NEVER constraints with almost no preamble; it assumes Claude's competence and avoids explaining basic concepts, so every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance with specific utilities (e.g. 'use h-dvh', 'animate only compositor props (transform, opacity)', 'text-balance for headings'), but lacks worked examples showing the rules applied to real markup. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'How to use' section defines two clear invocations and a review output format (violations, why it matters, fix), but the file-review path has no explicit validation/checkpoint step before emitting fixes. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear section headers (Stack, Components, Interaction, Animation, etc.) with no nested references and content appropriately kept inline for a constraints catalog; minor gaps as it exceeds the simple-skill line count. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |