Content
76%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill body is concise, well-structured, and provides concrete executable commands for install and probe execution. Its main gap is the missing validation checkpoint for the batch probe operation and the lack of a worked example showing how to interpret results.
Suggestions
Add a verification step after the probe, e.g. confirm the probe completed and inspect response tags before running /xray-report.
Include a brief worked example of one probe question and its expected tagged response to make report interpretation actionable.
Clarify the boundary between /xray (probe) and /xray-report so the two-phase workflow is explicit.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with tight sections and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section (dimensions table, command examples, output) earns its tokens. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste-ready commands cover install, full probe, single-dimension probe, and report generation, but there is no example of interpreting a probe response or report output. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Install and run steps are clearly sequenced, but the 30-question probe is a batch operation with no validation/verification checkpoint before report generation, capping this at 3 per the rubric. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Single-file SKILL.md is well-organized with clear section headers and one related-skill pointer, but with no bundle files there is no actual reference structure to navigate. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |