Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable brand-voice reference that uses tables and good/bad examples to deliver concrete guidance without over-explaining concepts Claude already knows. It is a single-purpose reference skill whose tone-selection decision procedure is clear, with only minor organization and conciseness refinements possible.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and assumes Claude's competence — rules and examples live in tight tables ("Instead of / Write," "Avoid / Prefer") with no padding about what a 404 or empty state is; a few prose sections like the dash-usage paragraph could be trimmed, keeping it just below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | As an instruction-only skill it provides concrete, copy-paste-ready guidance: explicit do/don't example tables, numbered error-message structure ("Say what happened / why / what to do next"), and good/bad pairs; minor gaps (e.g., no example for confirmation dialogs) hold it at 4. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Tone selection is a clear decision procedure (context table + "Default to Plain Speech" rule) and element guidelines are well-sequenced; it is a reference guideline rather than a multi-step destructive process, so checkpoints are not strictly required, but the absence of an explicit review/validate step keeps it at 4. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clearly headed sections (Tone Selection, Plain Speech, Sentry Voice, General Rules, UI Element Guidelines, Anti-Patterns) with two one-level-deep external references signaled at the end; no bundle files exist, and inlining the guideline is appropriate, but a couple of sections (dash usage, word choices) could arguably live in a reference file. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |