Content
22%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a near-empty placeholder: a redundant one-line summary and a 'When to Use' section pointing to a non-existent overview. It offers no actionable guidance, no workflow, and no meaningful structure beyond two headers. There are no bundle files in references/, scripts/, or assets/ to compensate.
Suggestions
Add the actual instructions, code examples, or commands that the skill is meant to provide so the body is actionable.
Remove the dangling reference to 'the overview' or create the overview content it points to.
Fix the redundant 'Development skill skill' phrasing and ensure each remaining line carries concrete value.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is short and contains no padded explanations of concepts Claude already knows, but the redundant phrasing 'Development skill skill' and the empty 'When to Use' sentence mean not every token earns its place, placing it at score-3 'Mostly efficient but could be tightened' rather than the fully-earned score-5 anchor. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | The body provides no concrete code, commands, or steps — only 'This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview' with no overview present, matching score-1 'Entirely vague or abstract; no concrete code or commands'. | 1 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | There is no sequence of steps and no validation checkpoints; the single line gestures at an undefined 'workflow' without defining it, matching score-1 'Steps missing or incoherent; no sequence', and the simple-skill exception does not apply because the action is ambiguous rather than unambiguous. | 1 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body has minimal section structure (# title, ## When to Use) and is under 50 lines with no bundle files, but the 'When to Use' section references 'the overview' which does not exist, a dangling reference that fits score-3 'Some structure but could be better organized; references present but not clearly signaled' rather than the well-organized score-5 case. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 8 / 20 Passed |