claude-code-guide

To provide a comprehensive reference for configuring and using Claude Code (the agentic coding tool) to its full potential. This skill synthesizes best practices, configuration templates, and advanced usage patterns.

Quality

41%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills/skills/claude-code-guide/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is claude-code-guide in sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

Quality

Content

53%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is reasonably structured and offers one concrete artifact (the CLAUDE.md template), but it pads in concepts Claude already knows and leaves debugging/best-practice guidance too abstract. Tightening redundancy and making steps executable would lift it most.

Suggestions

Cut the Purpose section (it repeats the frontmatter description) and trim general advice Claude already knows, such as 'Read README.md first' and 'Before editing, read the file content.'

Make Debugging and Best Practices steps executable: give specific commands (e.g. how to start a fresh session, exact verbose flags) instead of phrases like 'check the logs' or 'run with verbose output'.

Add an explicit validation/verification checkpoint to the editing workflow, e.g. 'After editing, run `npm test` and only proceed if tests pass.'

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The Purpose section duplicates the frontmatter description, and the Thinking Keywords / Best Practices sections restate general prompting habits Claude already knows, though the overall body is short.	3 / 5
Actionability	The CLAUDE.md template is copy-paste ready, but the Debugging and Best Practices sections stay high-level ('check the logs', 'ask for small changes') without specific executable steps.	3 / 5
Workflow Clarity	The Debugging section gives a rough 3-step sequence, but there are no validation checkpoints and the skill reads as a reference guide rather than a sequenced workflow.	3 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	The body is well-organized into clear sections with no nested references; the only minor gap is that the sizable CLAUDE.md template could plausibly live in its own reference file.	4 / 5
	Total	13 / 20 Passed

Description

28%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description identifies its domain but relies on generic abstractions and omits any explicit trigger guidance, leaving it weak on completeness and trigger term quality. It needs concrete capabilities and a 'Use when...' clause.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause naming concrete triggers, e.g. 'Use when setting up CLAUDE.md, configuring Claude Code for a project, or adopting advanced prompting patterns.'

Replace abstract phrasing ('synthesizes best practices') with concrete capabilities the skill delivers, such as 'Generate CLAUDE.md templates, list thinking keywords, and provide debugging steps.'

Include natural synonyms users would actually say ('set up Claude Code', 'CLAUDE.md', 'Claude Code configuration') to improve trigger term coverage.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain ('configuring and using Claude Code') but the actions are abstract ('provides a comprehensive reference', 'synthesizes best practices') with no concrete capabilities listed.	2 / 5
Completeness	It offers a vague 'what' ('comprehensive reference... synthesizes...') and entirely omits any 'when'/'Use when...' trigger guidance, matching the vague-what-and-no-when anchor.	2 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Only 'Claude Code' is a natural user phrase; the remaining terms ('best practices', 'configuration templates', 'advanced usage patterns') are generic abstractions rather than phrases users would say.	2 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Naming Claude Code gives it a recognizable niche, but the broad wording ('best practices', 'advanced usage patterns') leaves overlap risk with general usage skills.	3 / 5
	Total	9 / 20 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills
Path: plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills/skills/claude-code-guide/SKILL.md
Commit: 57c135b

Reviewed: 2 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.