Content
26%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is lean and sectioned but almost entirely vacuous — it offers no executable guidance, no workflow steps, and deflects substantive content to an external repo. Adding concrete, actionable instructions is the primary gap.
Suggestions
Add concrete, executable guidance — specific commands, code snippets, or named tools/methods — instead of the abstract 'provides guidance and patterns' phrasing.
Provide a clear step sequence for the skill's workflow (with validation checkpoints for any batch or data-mutating operations) rather than leaving the Instructions section empty of steps.
Replace the tautological 'when to use' sentence and the triple repetition of the skill name with substantive, tightened content that earns its tokens.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is short and free of concept over-explanation, but it repeats 'scientific research and analysis skills' three times and uses a tautological when-to-use sentence that could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | The Instructions section is entirely abstract ('provides guidance and patterns for...') with no code, commands, or specific steps — it describes rather than instructs. | 1 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | No multi-step process is given and the single intended action is vague and not unambiguous, so the workflow is effectively absent. | 1 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is brief and organized into clear sections (Overview, When to Use, Instructions) with no nested references, though it deflects detail to an external repo link rather than bundle files. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 9 / 20 Passed |