Content
61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tidy, well-structured Clean Code reference with concrete examples and a useful checklist, but as guidance it is heavier on abstract heuristics than on executable, sequenced instruction.
Suggestions
Add a short worked example per major section (e.g. a before/after refactor under Functions) to lift actionability toward executable guidance.
Convert the closing checklist into an ordered review workflow with explicit validation checkpoints (apply -> check -> iterate) to improve workflow clarity.
Trim the repeated description line and the Booch quote to tighten conciseness, since both restate the skill's purpose.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean bulleted reference of Clean Code heuristics with terse one-line items, fitting the 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed' anchor; the only mild padding is the repeated description line and the Booch quote, and it stops short of the verbose 3-anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives some concrete illustrations (e.g. 'elapsedTimeInDays instead of d', the Python benefits example) and a closing checklist, but most sections are abstract heuristics ('Do One Thing', 'No Side Effects') without executable steps or commands, matching the 'some concrete guidance but incomplete' anchor rather than the mostly-executable 4-anchor. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | There is no multi-step procedure — the skill is a principles reference rather than a sequenced workflow; the closing checklist supplies implicit checkpoints but no ordered sequence with validation, matching the 'steps listed but validation gaps; checkpoints implicit' anchor. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-organized into clearly headed sections (Names, Functions, Comments, ...) with no bundle files and no nested references; at ~88 self-contained lines it sits just above the <50-line simple-skill exception, so 'good structure; content appropriately placed; minor gaps' fits better than a clean 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |