community-marketing

Build and leverage online communities to drive product growth and brand loyalty.

Quality

44%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/community-marketing/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

63%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a solid community marketing skill with well-organized playbooks and specific guidance. Its main weaknesses are verbosity (explaining community principles Claude likely already understands) and the monolithic structure that could benefit from splitting detailed playbooks into referenced files. The actionability is good for an instruction-based skill, with concrete numbers and specific steps throughout.

Suggestions

Trim the 'Community Strategy Principles' section significantly—Claude understands community dynamics; focus on the non-obvious insights and specific frameworks unique to this skill.

Split detailed playbooks (Ambassador Program, Platform Guide, Metrics) into separate referenced files to improve progressive disclosure and reduce the main file's token footprint.

Add concrete templates (e.g., a sample welcome DM, a community guidelines template, a 90-day plan skeleton) to increase actionability from guidance to copy-paste-ready artifacts.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The skill contains useful information but is verbose in places. Principles like 'Value must flow to members first' and the flywheel explanation are somewhat obvious to Claude. The platform selection table and metrics sections add value but the overall document could be tightened by ~30%.	3 / 5
Actionability	The playbooks provide concrete, numbered steps with specific actions (e.g., 'Recruit 20-50 founding members manually,' 'Pre-populate channels with 5-10 posts'). However, there's no executable code, templates, or copy-paste ready artifacts—it's instruction-based guidance that is specific but not fully templated.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	The playbooks are clearly sequenced with numbered steps and logical progression. The 'Launching from Zero' and 'Growing' sections have clear ordering. However, there are no explicit validation checkpoints or feedback loops (e.g., 'check metrics after step 3 before proceeding'). Since this isn't a destructive/batch operation, the missing validation doesn't cap the score at 3.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	The content is well-structured with clear sections and headers, but it's a long monolithic file (~180 lines of content) with no references to supporting files. The platform guide, metrics, and individual playbooks could be split into separate referenced documents. References to related skills exist but no bundle files support deeper exploration.	3 / 5
	Total	14 / 20 Passed

Description

25%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This description is too vague and high-level to effectively differentiate itself from other marketing or growth-related skills. It lacks concrete actions, natural trigger terms, and any 'when to use' guidance, making it poorly suited for skill selection among a large set of available skills.

Suggestions

Add a 'Use when...' clause with specific trigger phrases like 'community management', 'building a user community', 'community-led growth', 'forum moderation', or 'community engagement strategy'.

Replace vague verbs ('build and leverage') with concrete actions such as 'Design community engagement programs, create moderation guidelines, plan community events, analyze member retention metrics'.

Include specific platforms or community types (e.g., 'Discord servers', 'Slack communities', 'online forums', 'developer communities') to improve distinctiveness and trigger term coverage.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain (online communities, product growth, brand loyalty) but the actions are vague — 'build and leverage' are generic verbs without concrete actions like 'create engagement strategies', 'moderate forums', or 'analyze community metrics'.	2 / 5
Completeness	Has a vague 'what' (build and leverage communities) but no 'when' clause at all. There is no explicit trigger guidance for when Claude should select this skill, which per the rubric should cap completeness at 3, and the weak 'what' brings it down to 2.	2 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Contains some relevant terms like 'online communities', 'product growth', and 'brand loyalty', but these are broad marketing buzzwords rather than natural phrases a user would say. Missing specific terms like 'community management', 'Discord', 'forum', 'user engagement', 'community-led growth'.	2 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Very broad description that could overlap with marketing strategy skills, social media skills, growth hacking skills, or brand management skills. 'Product growth' and 'brand loyalty' are generic enough to conflict with many related skills.	2 / 5
	Total	8 / 20 Passed

Validation

90%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 10 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	10 / 11 Passed

Repository: administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills
Path: skills/community-marketing/SKILL.md
Commit: 57c135b

Reviewed: 2 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.