competitor-alternatives

You are an expert in creating competitor comparison and alternative pages. Your goal is to build pages that rank for competitive search terms, provide genuine value to evaluators, and position your product effectively.

Quality

53%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills-claude/skills/competitor-alternatives/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is competitor-alternatives in sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

Quality

Content

57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a thorough, template-rich skill with strong actionability and clear section structure, but it is long and monolithic, inlining material that belongs in reference files, and lacks explicit validation checkpoints in its research/publishing workflow.

Suggestions

Move the full per-competitor YAML schema and the section templates into reference files (e.g. references/competitor-data.yaml, references/page-templates.md) and link to them one level deep from SKILL.md.

Add explicit validation checkpoints to the workflow, e.g. "Before publishing: verify competitor pricing against the live site and confirm all internal index links resolve."

Include one fully worked example page (real competitor, real copy) so the templates are demonstrably executable end-to-end.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body avoids over-explaining basic concepts (no "what is SEO" padding) and mostly delivers concrete templates, but at ~750 lines it inlines many full fill-in-the-blank templates and repeated section structures that could be tightened or moved to reference files.	3 / 5
Actionability	It provides concrete, copy-paste-ready assets: full page-structure outlines, a complete competitor-data YAML schema, comparison-table templates, and keyword-targeting tables. Minor gaps remain because most templates use placeholders ([Competitor], [Your Product]) rather than a worked end-to-end example.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	Multi-step processes are sequenced (Initial Assessment, the 5-step Research Process, Ongoing Updates), but there are no explicit validation checkpoints (e.g. verify competitor pricing is current before publishing, confirm internal links resolve), which caps workflow clarity at 3 for a batch content-generation skill.	3 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	The file is well sectioned with headers, but no bundle files exist (no references/scripts/assets) and all content — including the full per-competitor YAML schema and every page-format template — is inlined in SKILL.md rather than split into one-level-deep reference files.	3 / 5
	Total	13 / 20 Passed

Description

48%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly names its niche and goals but is written in second person, lists goals rather than concrete actions, and omits any "Use when..." trigger guidance. It is recognizable but not maximally actionable as a skill trigger.

Suggestions

Rewrite in third person and lead with concrete actions, e.g. "Builds competitor comparison and alternative pages..." instead of "You are an expert... Your goal is to build...".

Add an explicit trigger clause: "Use when creating competitor comparison pages, 'X vs Y' pages, or '[competitor] alternative' content for SEO."

Include natural search-term variants users say ("alternatives to", "vs", "tools like") to improve trigger matching.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	The description names the domain ("competitor comparison and alternative pages") and lists goals like "build pages that rank," "provide genuine value," and "position your product effectively," but these are goals rather than concrete executable actions. Reduced by 1 per guideline because it uses second-person voice ("You are an expert... Your goal is to build").	2 / 5
Completeness	It gives a clear "what" (build competitor comparison/alternative pages) but provides no "when" trigger clause (no "Use when..."), which per the guidelines caps completeness at 3.	3 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	It surfaces relevant natural terms ("competitor comparison," "alternative pages," "competitive search terms") but misses common variations users actually say such as "alternatives to [X]," "[X] vs [Y]," "tools like," and any file/URL extensions.	3 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The niche (SEO competitor/alternative comparison pages) is fairly distinct, with only minor overlap risk against closely related skills like programmatic-seo or copywriting mentioned in the body.	4 / 5
	Total	12 / 20 Passed

Validation

87%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
skill_md_line_count	SKILL.md is long (757 lines); consider splitting into references/ and linking	Warning
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	14 / 16 Passed

Repository: administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills
Path: plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills-claude/skills/competitor-alternatives/SKILL.md
Commit: 57c135b

Reviewed: 2 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.