Content
73%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, actionable methodology with an exceptionally clear sequenced workflow and built-in validation feedback loops, which is the skill's main strength. Its only real weakness is conciseness: the checklist duplicates the sweeps and some basic writing concepts are re-explained.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient and the Seven Sweeps framework is the skill's genuine value, but the 'Copy Editing Checklist' section largely duplicates the seven sweep descriptions and the 'Quick-Pass'/'Common Problems' sections overlap, so it could be tightened; it also explains some basics Claude already knows (passive voice, nominalizations). | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, specific guidance abounds — the So What test with ❌/✅ examples, the vague→specific and weak→strong replacement tables, and symptom/fix problem entries give executable editing moves with only minor gaps (no full before/after paragraph walkthrough). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Seven Sweeps are explicitly sequenced (Sweep 1→7), each ending with a loop-back checkpoint ('After this sweep: Return to Clarity Sweep...'), and 'Working with Copy Sweeps' defines a full validate→fix→re-verify→repeat-until-clean feedback loop with a checklist, matching the anchor 5 example. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist (references/, scripts/, assets/ absent) so the skill is self-contained, and the body is well-organized into clearly headed sections and tables; it scores 4 rather than 5 because, at ~440 lines, some material (word-replacement lists, the full checklist) could be externalized into a reference file rather than inlined. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |