Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a model alias stub: minimal, unambiguous, and complete for its purpose. It concisely states the compatibility rationale, points to the canonical skill by exact name, and instructs running that skill's workflow — nothing more is needed, and nothing is padded.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Four short sentences with zero padding: "This skill name is kept for compatibility." is the only explanatory line and it earns its place by stating why the skill exists; nothing explains concepts Claude already knows. Lean and efficient — every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The instruction is fully executable for a redirect skill: "run the same workflow and conventions documented in `sentry-skills:pr-writer`" names a precise, unambiguous target. Per the rubric's instruction-only note, absence of code is not penalized when the guidance is actionable, and there are no gaps or vagueness here. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a simple single-purpose skill (well under 50 lines) whose one action — "If invoked via `create-pr`, run the same workflow... in `sentry-skills:pr-writer`" — is unambiguous, so it qualifies for the simple-skill exception with a clear score of 5. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill has no bundle files, so nothing needs splitting; the body is under 50 lines, has a clear header, and its single reference (`sentry-skills:pr-writer`) is a named skill, clearly signaled in backticks rather than a buried or nested file reference. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 20 / 20 Passed |