Content
56%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill lays out a well-sequenced orchestration workflow with genuine decision thresholds, fallback modes, and error handling, but it is held back by pseudocode-level guidance, undefined dependencies on sources.json/cache.json, and padded/redundant sections (ASCII diagram, repeated filter criteria, filler "When to Use").
Suggestions
Define the sources.json and cache.json schemas (or ship them as bundle files in the skill directory) since the entire workflow reads and writes them without ever specifying their format.
Replace the 36-line ASCII architecture diagram with a short bullet summary of the dispatch/monitor/evaluate loop — the Phase sections already convey the same information.
State the filter/exclude criteria once and reference them from the SubAgent prompt examples instead of repeating them three times, and add a step for validating/handling malformed JSON returned by SubAgents.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient — the phases give real instruction without explaining concepts Claude already knows — but the 36-line ASCII architecture diagram largely duplicates the Phase 1-8 descriptions, the filter/exclude criteria are repeated three times (Phase 3, both SubAgent examples), and the "When to Use" section is pure filler ("This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview"). These padded sections keep it below the efficient anchors at 4-5 but it is not the verbose concept-explanation pattern of 2. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | There are concrete elements — named MCP tools (mcp__chrome-devtools__new_page, take_snapshot, close_page), specific source URLs, and numeric decision thresholds (">= 25 AND HighQuality >= 20") — but the core guidance is YAML pseudocode ("Wave 1 (Parallel)", task schemas) rather than executable instructions, the example output JSON contains "..." placeholders, and the sources.json/cache.json formats the whole flow depends on are never specified. This matches the score-3 anchor of some concrete guidance with missing key details. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The eight phases are clearly sequenced with explicit decision checkpoints ("Items >= 25 AND HighQuality >= 20 → Stop scraping", "< 15 → Continue to next batch"), a feedback loop ("If a SubAgent fails, decide whether to retry or skip... mark as disabled"), deduplication validation, and an error-handling table. It falls short of 5 only for minor validation gaps, e.g. no instruction for handling malformed JSON returned by a SubAgent or verifying the generated report output. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body has clear section headers and no nested references, but the entire skill is monolithic: no references/, scripts/, or assets/ bundle files exist, and the two files the workflow depends on — sources.json and cache.json — are referenced without their schemas ever being defined. Content like the output template and example SubAgent prompts could live in separate reference files, matching the score-3 anchor of some structure with content that should be separate inlined. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |