CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

database-cloud-optimization-cost-optimize

You are a cloud cost optimization expert specializing in reducing infrastructure expenses while maintaining performance and reliability. Analyze cloud spending, identify savings opportunities, and implement cost-effective architectures across AWS, Azure, and GCP.

54

Quality

61%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills/skills/database-cloud-optimization-cost-optimize/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is database-cloud-optimization-cost-optimize in rmyndharis/antigravity-skills

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is well-structured and reasonably concise, but it provides only high-level instructional guidance without executable specifics, lacks integrated validation checkpoints for destructive operations, and points to a referenced playbook file that is missing from the bundle.

Suggestions

Add concrete executable detail such as specific CLI commands or tool names (e.g., 'aws ce get-cost-and-usage', 'gcloud billing') to make the instructions copy-paste ready.

Integrate validation checkpoints directly into the workflow sequence (e.g., validate in staging -> review -> promote) with an explicit fix-and-retry feedback loop for resizing/deletion.

Either provide the referenced 'resources/implementation-playbook.md' file or remove the broken reference so navigation does not dead-end.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly lean with well-organized sections and no padding about concepts Claude already knows, though the opening paragraph duplicates the frontmatter description and the 'Context' section restates the goal, which could be trimmed.

4 / 5

Actionability

Instructions give concrete intent ('Collect cost data by service, resource, and time window', 'Identify waste and quick wins with estimated savings') but lack executable specifics such as CLI commands, tool names, or service-specific queries needed to actually execute.

3 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A rough collect-identify-propose-implement sequence exists and the Safety section mentions validation, but for a skill involving destructive operations (resizing, deletion) the validation is in a separate section rather than integrated as explicit checkpoints, so per the rubric cap workflow clarity stays at 3.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Sections are well organized and the single reference to 'resources/implementation-playbook.md' is clearly signaled one level deep, but that referenced file does not exist on disk and no bundle directory is present, creating a navigation dead-end.

3 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Description

66%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly communicates a multi-cloud cost optimization capability with several concrete actions, but loses points for second-person voice, a missing explicit 'Use when' trigger, and slightly incomplete trigger-term coverage.

Suggestions

Rewrite in third person ('Analyzes cloud spending...') to avoid the voice penalty and improve specificity.

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause naming trigger phrases users would say (e.g., 'Use when reducing cloud spend, rightsizing instances, or reviewing AWS/Azure/GCP bills').

Include more natural synonyms such as 'cloud bill', 'FinOps', and 'reduce spend' to broaden trigger-term coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions ('Analyze cloud spending, identify savings opportunities, and implement cost-effective architectures across AWS, Azure, and GCP') approaching comprehensive coverage, but the second-person 'You are a cloud cost optimization expert' voice triggers the mandated 1-point specificity penalty from a base of 5.

4 / 5

Completeness

The 'what' is clearly stated but there is no 'Use when...' trigger clause, so per the rubric guideline completeness is capped at 3.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural keywords like 'cloud cost optimization', 'cloud spending', 'infrastructure expenses', and 'AWS, Azure, and GCP' are terms users would plausibly say, but common variations like 'cloud bill' or 'reduce AWS spend' are missing.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Cloud cost optimization across the three major clouds is a distinct niche with minimal conflict risk, though it could marginally overlap with general cloud governance or FinOps skills.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.