Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is concise and well-structured with appropriate progressive disclosure to a real reference file. Its main weakness is actionability and workflow clarity: the instructions list what to produce but lack concrete selection guidance and validation checkpoints.
Suggestions
Inline the available relationship patterns (or a one-line cheat-sheet) so 'Choose relationship patterns per pair' is actionable without forcing a file open for the common case.
Add a validation/review checkpoint in the workflow (e.g., 'Review the contract ownership matrix for upstream/downstream consistency before finalizing').
Provide a minimal inline example of the contract ownership matrix or relationship map rather than only a prose output requirement.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and well-sectioned with no over-explanation of DDD concepts Claude already knows; every section (use/don't-use, instructions, outputs, examples, limitations) earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Steps name concrete deliverables but defer execution specifics to the reference (e.g., 'Choose relationship patterns per pair' without selection criteria), leaving incomplete actionable detail in the body itself. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-step numbered sequence exists, but there are no validation or review checkpoints; the sequence-present-but-checkpoints-missing anchor fits best, and no destructive/batch exception applies. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with well-organized sections and a single clearly-signaled, one-level-deep reference (references/context-map-patterns.md) that exists as a real file, satisfying the simple-skill exception. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |