Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is concise, well-organized, and uses progressive disclosure effectively with a real template reference. The main gap is the lack of an explicit validation checkpoint in the workflow to confirm artifacts are complete and internally consistent.
Suggestions
Add an explicit verification step (e.g., 'Validate that every bounded context in the catalog has an owner team and that each glossary term is bound to a context') before the ADR capture step.
Make the ubiquitous-language step slightly more prescriptive by naming the required columns or referencing the template's glossary table format.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and well-structured, assuming Claude's DDD knowledge without explaining basic concepts; every section earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Instructions are concrete and specific ('classify subdomains', 'define bounded contexts around consistency and ownership', 'capture context boundaries in ADRs'), and a real template reference is provided, though the steps are high-level rather than fully prescriptive. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-step sequence is present and the 'Required artifacts' section functions as an output checklist, but there is no explicit validation/verification step confirming the artifacts are complete and consistent. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Short overview body with a single, clearly signaled, one-level-deep reference to a real file (references/strategic-design-template.md); no nested references and easy to navigate. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |