Content
60%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body delivers a concrete, well-sequenced MCP retrieval and synthesis workflow with a clear output template, but pays for it with redundant sections and vague filler (Usage Example) that inflate token cost without adding guidance. A consolidation pass would lift both conciseness and organization.
Suggestions
Merge the duplicated 'Overview' and 'The Goal' sections into one, and fold 'Tips for Success' and 'Common Pitfalls' into 'Best Practices' to remove overlapping advice.
Replace the vague 'Usage Example' pseudo-instructions with the actual MCP call sequence (or delete the section, since the Retrieval workflow already covers it).
Add an explicit validation checkpoint before writing DESIGN.md, e.g. 'Re-check every hex code against the fetched HTML/CSS source before generating the file.'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The 'Overview' and 'The Goal' sections repeat the same two sentences nearly verbatim ('serve as the "source of truth" for prompting Stitch...', 'Stitch interprets design through "Visual Descriptions"...'), and 'Best Practices', 'Tips for Success', and 'Common Pitfalls' overlap substantially — several padded sections, matching anchor 2 rather than anchor 3's 'some unnecessary explanation'. | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives concrete executable guidance: exact MCP calls ('list_tools', '[prefix]:list_projects' with 'filter: "view=owned"', '[prefix]:get_screen'), exact response fields ('screenshot.downloadUrl', 'designTheme'), concrete translations ('rounded-full' -> 'Pill-shaped'), and a full output template. Minor gaps keep it below anchor 5: the 'Usage Example' section offers vague pseudo-instruction ('Use the Stitch MCP Server to get the Furniture Collection project') instead of real call syntax. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 6-step retrieval sequence (namespace discovery -> project lookup -> screen lookup -> metadata fetch -> asset download -> metadata extraction) and a 5-step analysis pipeline, with checkpoints like extracting IDs at each lookup step. No explicit validation/feedback loop (e.g., verifying hex codes against the fetched HTML before writing the file), matching anchor 4's 'most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps' rather than anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Single-file skill with clearly headed, one-level-deep sections and a clearly signaled external reference (the Stitch prompting guide URL); no bundle files exist to evaluate. Minor organization gaps — the duplicated Overview/Goal sections and three overlapping advice sections, plus inline Tailwind-translation mappings that could live in a reference file — hold it at anchor 4 rather than anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |