Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body presents a clear, well-sequenced routing workflow with strong gating and enforcement rules, and all content is appropriately placed in a single file. Its weaknesses are modest padding (philosophy aphorisms and a filler 'When to Use' section) and a few soft spots in actionability where criteria or recovery targets are left unspecified.
Suggestions
Delete the 'Design Philosophy' section and the 'When to Use' filler line; they add no routing instruction.
Tighten the Step 5 failure path: specify which skill to return to for each failed condition instead of 'the appropriate skill'.
Give the risk classification slightly firmer criteria (e.g., which factors make a design 'high risk') so the routing decision is reproducible rather than judgment-only.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The routing logic itself is tight, but several sections add no instruction: the 'Design Philosophy' aphorisms ('Good systems fail early. Bad systems fail in production.'), the filler 'When to Use' line ('This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.'), and repeated statements of purpose. This matches 'mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened' rather than the minor-trim level-4 anchor. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete decision rules throughout: risk tiers map to required actions ('High risk → REQUIRE multi-agent-brainstorming'), explicit prohibitions ('You may NOT proceed without these artifacts'), and a named-artifact checklist. Minor gaps remain — risk classification relies on open-ended 'factors such as' and artifact formats are defined only in the external controlled skills — so it is not the fully executable level-5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence with an explicit readiness checklist (Step 5) and a feedback loop ('block execution / return to the appropriate skill'). It falls short of level 5 because recovery guidance is vague ('the appropriate skill' is unspecified) and validation of the risk classification itself is left implicit. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections in a single appropriately-sized file with no nested references and no content that clearly belongs in a separate file; all routing logic lives correctly in SKILL.md. Minor organization issues (redundant trailing sections, and the exit bullet at line 153 runs into the following '---' divider) keep it below the clean level-5 anchor; it also exceeds the under-50-line simple-skill exception. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |