Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a strong router-style skill body: lean, well-sectioned, and actionable, with an explicit viability gate, a concrete routing map, and a genuine one-level-deep reference file that matches its citation. The only meaningful gap is the absence of a concrete example of the required output or an artifact, which keeps actionability and workflow clarity at 4.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: terse bullet sections with no explanation of what DDD is or how the patterns work, and every section (use/do-not-use, viability check, routing map, output requirements, limitations) earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete throughout — the two-of-four viability criteria, exact routing targets like `@ddd-strategic-design` and `@cqrs-implementation`, and named artifacts (subdomains, bounded contexts, language glossary). It falls short of a 5 only because there is no worked example of what the required output or an artifact actually looks like. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered sequence exists with an explicit decision gate (the viability check) before committing and strategic-first ordering, but step 4's 'success criteria and evidence' are named without any checkpoint for how to verify them, matching anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | SKILL.md is a well-organized overview with one clearly signaled, one-level-deep reference ('If templates are needed, open references/ddd-deliverables.md'), and that file exists and delivers exactly the promised deliverable templates — clear navigation with no buried or nested references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |