Conciseness

The body is mostly lean, assumes Claude's competence, and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but the 'Remember' section recapitulates earlier guidance ('Review plan critically first', 'Stop when blocked, don't guess'), a minor redundancy that keeps it below the fully-lean anchor 5.

Actionability

Guidance is concrete and executable for an instruction-only skill: default batch of 'First 3 tasks', TodoWrite in_progress/completed transitions, exact phrases to say ('Ready for feedback.'), and a named sub-skill; verification details are deferred to the plan ('Run verifications as specified'), a minor gap below anchor 5.

Workflow Clarity

Steps 1-5 are clearly sequenced with explicit checkpoints (review before starting, report between batches) and feedback loops (stop-and-ask conditions, revisit Step 1 on plan changes); because the skill itself does not define what verification looks like and defers it to the plan, it sits at anchor 4 rather than 5, and the batch-operation cap is avoided since checkpoints and stop conditions are present.

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist and the skill is well-organized into clearly-headed sections (Overview, Process, Stop/Ask, Revisit, Remember, When to Use) with a single appropriately-signaled one-level sub-skill reference; the tautological 'When to Use' section ('applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview') and the redundant 'Remember' section are minor organization gaps that hold it below anchor 5.

Specificity

The description names the domain ('written implementation plan to execute') and 1-2 concrete actions ('execute', 'review checkpoints'), which anchors at 3, but it is written in second person ('Use when you have'), which the rubric penalizes by reducing specificity by 1.

Completeness

Both the 'what' (execute a written implementation plan with review checkpoints) and 'when' ('Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session') are present and explicit, but they are blended into a single clause rather than cleanly separated, matching anchor 4 rather than 5.

Trigger Term Quality

Natural terms like 'implementation plan', 'execute', 'review checkpoints', and 'separate session' are phrases a user would plausibly say; minor synonyms like 'run this plan' or 'follow the plan steps' are absent, so it sits below the comprehensive anchor 5.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche (executing a written plan in a separate session with review checkpoints) is fairly distinct with a clear trigger; minor overlap risk remains with general planning or implementation skills, so it does not fully reach the minimal-conflict anchor 5.