Content
43%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured and concise but largely generic, offering no executable FastAPI guidance and relying on a resource file that is absent. Actionability and workflow clarity are the weakest dimensions.
Suggestions
Add at least one concrete, executable FastAPI example (e.g. a minimal async app skeleton with dependency injection) so the skill is actionable without the external file.
Replace the generic Instructions with a real sequenced FastAPI project workflow that includes explicit validation checkpoints (e.g. run the test suite / start the server to verify).
Create `resources/implementation-playbook.md` (or correct the path) so the referenced progressive-disclosure target actually exists.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and free of concept over-explanation, but generic boilerplate ("Apply relevant best practices and validate outcomes"; the "Do not use this skill when" section) could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides only minimal concrete guidance — a pointer to open `resources/implementation-playbook.md` — with no executable code, commands, or specific steps, and that referenced file does not exist. | 2 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Only a rough generic sequence is present ("Clarify goals... Apply relevant best practices... Provide actionable steps and verification") with many gaps and no real validation checkpoints specific to FastAPI. | 2 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized and a one-level-deep reference is clearly signaled, but the referenced `resources/implementation-playbook.md` is missing, so the disclosure does not actually deliver. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 11 / 20 Passed |