Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured review workflow with strong sequencing, explicit validation, and concrete commands. The only minor gap is the lack of a worked example of a reported finding.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: no explanations of what bugs or security vulnerabilities are, just phases, checklists, and an output format, so every token earns its place per anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a copy-paste git diff command, a concrete per-file attack-surface list, a specific security checklist, and a structured output format; the minor gap is the absence of a worked example finding, keeping it at anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Five clearly sequenced phases with an explicit mandatory validation checkpoint (Phase 5 "Before finalizing, you MUST"), error-recovery guidance (Phase 1 truncation handling, Phase 4 verify-before-reporting), and checklists for a complex process, matching anchor 5; the skill is read-only so the destructive-cap does not apply. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and none are needed; the content is a self-contained, well-organized single workflow with clear section headers, satisfying the simple-skill exception for well-organized sections at anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |